First on Fox: Republicans on the Home Oversight Committee are investigating the decision-making behind what they see because the Biden administration’s “conflicting” statements on border wall development on the southern border — after the administration waived dozens of federal laws to permit development in Texas.

Republicans on the committee, led by Chairman James Comer, wrote to Homeland Safety Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas in regards to the transfer to waive 26 federal legal guidelines to permit development of limitations and roads in Starr County, Texas.

Building is funded by way of the FY 2019 DHS Appropriations Invoice, which particularly funded wall tasks within the RGV sector that DHS is required to make use of for his or her meant function.

Whereas development was introduced in June, Mayorkas this month cited the “pressing and rapid want” in a declaration within the US Federal Register for federal laws to be waived resulting from an increase in unlawful crossings within the space.

Mayorkas factors to the “rapid want” to waive laws and construct a border wall in Texas as immigration will increase

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer

President James Comer, R-Ky., desires solutions in regards to the wall the Biden administration is constructing. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Name, Inc through Getty Photographs)

“There may be at the moment a crucial and rapid must assemble bodily limitations and roads close to the U.S. border with a purpose to forestall unlawful entry into america within the venture areas pursuant to Sections 102(a) and 102(b),” Mayorkas mentioned. Immigrants of 1996).

This instantly sparked claims from each Republicans and Democrats that it was a departure from the administration’s earlier positions on the wall. The administration halted border wall development in early 2021 and known as such tasks ineffective whereas additionally promoting off border wall supplies.

Biden says ‘no,’ border wall would not work, after Mayorkas cites ‘rapid’ want

Lawmakers agreed on the necessity for a wall, Coomer mentioned, citing the persevering with file numbers on the border.

“On the face of it, your phrases acknowledge a seemingly apparent level: that border limitations are a necessary a part of border safety, as a result of they’ve “confirmed to be a crucial part of operational border management” by diverting or slowing unlawful crossings. “Smuggled individuals or items result in “It ends in a major and measurable discount in unlawful entry into the areas the place they’re established whereas requiring much less manpower to patrol.” “Nevertheless, administration officers proceed to emphasize that this motion doesn’t represent a change in coverage and that the border limitations are ineffective.”

Mayorkas has since mentioned there is no such thing as a new coverage on border wall development, and the administration has been approved to spend cash appropriated by Congress in the course of the Trump period.

“From day one, this administration has made clear {that a} border wall shouldn’t be the reply. This stays our place and our place has by no means wavered. The language within the Federal Register discover was taken out of context and doesn’t imply any change.” “Completely in politics,” he mentioned in an October 5 assertion.

“We have now repeatedly requested Congress to cancel these funds, however they haven’t achieved so and we’re pressured to observe the regulation,” he mentioned.

Republicans on the oversight committee additionally pointed to White Home statements saying “we consider the border wall is ineffective” and related statements by President Biden himself.

A DHS spokesperson mentioned the company responds to congressional correspondence by way of official channels and “will proceed to reply appropriately to congressional oversight.” The spokesman famous the fiscal yr 2019 necessities for spending the funds, and that Congress wouldn’t rescind the appropriation.

“After two years of making an attempt to persuade Congress to reallocate funding to smarter, more practical coverage interventions, the one technique to spend the cash as Congress wished was to subject a waiver of those legal guidelines,” they mentioned. “The waiver language was written to make sure that DHS complies with Congress’s 2019 statutory mandate that DHS spend funds designated to construct the border wall. This isn’t an announcement of administration coverage.”

“Politically, the administration doesn’t agree with the 2019 congressional authorization and continues to oppose additional border wall development. Nevertheless, DHS should and can abide by the regulation,” they mentioned.

The administration additionally known as on Congress to eradicate or reallocate further border funding and divert it elsewhere. DHS pointed to calls made in 2022 and 2021 for Congress to maneuver cash elsewhere, together with within the fiscal yr 2022 finances — which sought to reallocate fiscal yr 2019 funding.

Lawmakers are looking for paperwork and communications associated to the development of the border barrier, in addition to Mayorkas’ assertion outlining the administration’s coverage — in addition to communications between the Division of Homeland Safety and the White Home.


In an announcement to Fox Information Digital, Comer mentioned the administration’s preliminary strikes to halt border wall development amid the continuing border disaster had been “indifferent from actuality.”

“It was solely after the Biden administration offered off unused border wall supplies that had sat idle since President Biden’s first day in workplace that the Division of Homeland Safety lastly acknowledged that there was a must construct bodily limitations alongside the border,” he mentioned. “Whereas the White Home continues to stay in fantasy land, Republican watchdogs have continued and can proceed to battle for the American individuals and maintain this administration accountable for his or her failures alongside the border.”

Categorized in: